A prediction within gravimotion′s interpretation of Nature is that our body weight varies along the day.
The variation is due to the fact that our body′s part of gravimotion consequential to earth′s spin gets reversed in direction twice a day with respect to that other part of our body′s gravimotion and consequential to our motion around the sun.
In gravimotion′s interpretation of Nature, the Universe has no beginning and no end, and is replaced by the infinite present; as such no Big Bang ever occurred.
On July 12 2009 I thought of a much more elegant interpretation to provide for the observed red shift, discrediting science so called expension theory; the far away from us visible stars and constellations have gravity of their own, equivalent to accelerated motions toward them, producing the red shifts observed; such gravitational frequency shift being discovered by Einstein.
All in all in gravimotion interpretation of Nature, the Universe inhabited by gravity is not expanding!
The universe is no longer interpreted as (inert) space expanding (under the influence of something).
The universe is a finite live entity, none else than the finite present, yet indefinitely renewing itself in motion, rather than in time. Einstein discovered and predicted both kinetic time dilation and gravity time dilation.
Physically the phenomenon′s respectively coincide to the slowing of time with added motion, and to the acceleration of time in altitude.
On the other hand there is no mention (that could be found) of latitude time dilation.
In gravimotion′s interpretation of Nature, the internal motion mechanism and display of a clock will run slower at the equator than at either pole.
This is because the internal motion mechanism of a clock, in gravimotion, is physically dependent on the clock′s overall motion. And because the rotational motion of earth is much more intense at the equator than it is at any of its 2 poles, a clock will be physically running slower at the equator.
Evidently, measures would have to take in account the flattening of earth, which acts as gravitational time dilation.
Using traditional thinking (that is science of physics), this paragraph would be stated as follows: time runs faster at the poles than it does at the equator.
As far as the author knows, nobody yet talked about (or discovered) latitude time dilation.

For the same reason our body weight varies along the day, the time given by a clock varies along the day.
A clock at the equator has opposite directions at 6am and 6pm. In between these 2 specific times the overall motion of the clock either increases or decreases due to the compounding of earth′s spin and earth′s revolution around the sun; the overall motion of the clock inter-acting onto its own internal motion mechanism, the alleged time provided by the clock will vary along the day accordingly.
Gravimotion′s variation of time along the day differs from physics time dilation (even though the underlying phenomenon is the same) in that the clock that provides varying readings along the day (in gravimotion) is physics′ reference clock on the ground that is (in physics′ mathematics and experiments) not varying! Physicists will revoke the interpretation of the Michelson Morley experiments of the 1890′s, which assert there is no "aether".
Light rays will be found travelling through an "aether", actually admitted unwittingly to exist by physicists themselves in the quantum theory under the name quantum jitter nevertheless qualified quantum vacuum.
Light particle/wave duality will then be merged into unity; physics light duality will fade with time just as light fades with distances.
And as another consequence, physicists will have to recognize that the atom rather than being a metaphysical oddity, has instead a physical constitution, while remaining under quantic jurisdiction.
See physical subatomic transmitters and beacons do substantiate Bohr′s quantic energy levels. Gravomotion′s interpretation of the atom (link above) leads straight into abolishing quantum indeterminism.
Click: There is a cause, which justify the statistical behavior of entangled pairs of particles.